Root canal treatment
May be considered when the tooth nerve is infected but the tooth can be restored predictably.
Tooth extraction may be considered when a tooth cannot be saved predictably, is infected, badly broken, loose or causing ongoing risk.
Extraction is sometimes the safest option, but it should follow a clear explanation of why saving the tooth is not predictable or not worthwhile. Replacement planning may also be part of the decision.
May be considered when the tooth nerve is infected but the tooth can be restored predictably.
May be suitable when the tooth is weak but still restorable.
Useful when the diagnosis or long-term value of the tooth is unclear.
Root canal treatment may save a restorable tooth; extraction may be more predictable when the tooth is cracked, weak or poorly supported.
A crown protects a tooth worth keeping, while extraction is considered when protection will not make the tooth reliable.
Monitoring can be reasonable when symptoms are stable and risk is low, but infection, fracture or mobility can change the timing.
It is often considered after saving options, but sometimes extraction is the most sensible and predictable choice.
Not always. The decision depends on location, chewing, appearance, bite stability and neighbouring teeth.
Book a normal appointment to understand the problem, alternatives and whether treatment is appropriate.